Sunday, October 24, 2010

New Hampshire's The Union Leader: We want our chance at a bigoted vote!

The awful people behind this newspaper have probably been happily kicking gays their entire life. It must be so annoying not being able to in the voting box.

Oh well, no matter, there are other spiteful ways to continue the kicking...

New Hampshire's The Union Leader won't print gay marriage notices, even tho it is legal in that state.

Why you may ask?

"This newspaper has never published wedding or engagement announcements from homosexual couples. It would be hypocritical of us to do so, given our belief that marriage is and needs to remain a social and civil structure between men and women, and our opposition to the recent state law legalizing gay marriage.

That law was not subject to public referendum and the governor (John Lynch) who signed it was elected after telling voters that he was opposed to gay marriage. Indeed, in no state where the public has been allowed a direct vote on the subject has gay marriage prevailed.

We are not "anti-gay." We are for marriage remaining the important man-woman institution it has always been.

While the law sanctions gay marriage, it neither demands that churches perform them or that our First Amendment right to choose what we print be suspended. In accordance with that right, we continue our longstanding policy of printing letters to the editor from New Hampshire citizens, whether or not they agree with us."


Translation: We are bigots, openly so. We didn't get to vote to maintain our bigotry, so we will maintain it in protest.

Laws? We don't need no stinkin' laws

No comments: