Have you read proposition 8? It is a strange construct for an English sentence.
You have to be very careful when writing constitutional language. If they are defining Marriage in one sentence, then they haven't excluded incest, for example.
Will Judges be compelled, to legalize incest. (as http://RavagedFaces.com/ suggests) based on that wording? I'd be very afraid to vote YES on this one.
2 comments:
just because the video is kind of cheesy doesn't mean that children don't have a natural and fundamental right to a mom and a dad.
france rejected same-sex marriage for this exact reason.
http://prop8discussion.wordpress.com/2008/10/27/thank-you-france-children-have-a-right-to-a-mom-and-a-dad-merci/
Have you read proposition 8? It is a strange construct for an English sentence.
You have to be very careful when writing constitutional language. If they are defining Marriage in one sentence, then they haven't excluded incest, for example.
Will Judges be compelled, to legalize incest. (as http://RavagedFaces.com/ suggests) based on that wording? I'd be very afraid to vote YES on this one.
Post a Comment